Issue - meetings
Notice of Motion - Traveller incursions in the Borough
Meeting: 09/03/2020 - The Council (Item 845)
Second Extension to Turnstone Estates in respect of the Proposed Seaway Development
The Worshipful the Mayor had agreed to call this Council meeting following a requisition by 10 Councillors, pursuant to Section 3 of Schedule 12 of the Local Government Act 1972, to consider ‘Second Extension to Turnstone Estates in respect of the Proposed Seaway Development.’ The Worshipful the Mayor was satisfied that this matter was a legitimate subject for the Council to debate.
Councillors were informed that the decision of Cabinet held on 25th February 2020 about this matter has been called in to the Policy and Resources Scrutiny Committee on 18th March 2020 and this Committee will also consider the Notice of Motion presented to Council on 27th February 2020.
A debate took place and the Worshipful the Mayor thanked Councillors for their contributions.
Meeting: 13/06/2019 - The Council (Item 25)
Notice of Motion attached
- Report of Strategic Director (Legal & Democratic Services), item 25 PDF 81 KB
- Webcast for Notice of Motion - Traveller incursions in the Borough
The Worshipful the Mayor had agreed to call this Council meeting following a requisition by 5 Councillors, pursuant to Section 3 of Schedule 12 of the Local Government Act 1972, to consider a Notice of Motion on traveller incursions in the Borough, which was before Councillors for consideration.
The Council also considered a report from the Strategic Director (Legal and Democratic Services) providing advice on whether a Borough-wide injunction against unauthorised traveller encampments could be obtained.
In accordance with Standing Order 12(a) a named vote was taken on proposal 4 of the Notice of Motion, (officers seek through the courts a borough-wide injunction to deter illegal encampments and ensure their swift removal) as follows:
For Proposal 4:
Cllrs Aylen, Boyd, Bright, Buck, Burzotta, Cox, Davidson, Dear, F. Evans, K. Evans, Flewitt, Folkard, D Garston, Habermel, Jarvis, McGlone, Moring, Nelson, Salter, Van Looy, Wakefield, Walker and Ward (23).
Against Proposal 4:
Cllrs Beck, Burton, Chalk, Collins, Cowan, Dent, George, Gilbert, Harp, Hooper, Jones, Kelly, McDonald, Mitchell, Mulroney, Nevin, Robinson, Shead, Stafford, Terry, Wexham, Willis and Woodley (23)
Cllr Lamb (The Worshipful the Mayor) (1)
The Worshipful the Mayor used his casting vote against proposal 4 of the notice of motion.
Therefore, Proposal 4 was not carried.
That, in accordance with Standing Order 8.4, the following Notice of Motion including the proposals set out in 1-3 of the Motion, be referred to the Cabinet:
“Traveller Incursions in the Borough
This Council shares public concern about travellers illegally occupying public open spaces and other areas in the Borough. Whenever travellers are evicted by the Council from one site they move on to occupy another available site in the vicinity.
This has been going on for many months at the expense of public funds. The process of undertaking travellers’ needs assessments, court orders and injunctions is not only costly and time consuming but also causes a good deal of inconvenience and anxiety to the local residents. Subsequent cleaning up and securing of the sites after the travellers’ eviction is achieved at further expense to the taxpayer.
By their very nature, our public open spaces need to remain open and accessible to residents. Whilst the Council uses a number of methods to seek to prevent illegal encampments on our public open spaces, this is difficult to achieve without stopping residents from accessing them.
The Council therefore seeks to achieve a balance between actively discouraging illegal encampments and maintaining access for residents from those who are determined to set up illegal encampments without affecting residents’ rights of access to their public open spaces.
A strong partnership approach to illegal encampments on our public open spaces between the Council and the Police is required. Police action can speed up the eviction process and we are dependent on the police service’s ability to continue to support us in this way.
The Council therefore resolves that it should:
1. Take a proactive approach and take any ... view the full minutes text for item 25