Items
No. |
Item |
809. |
Apologies for Absence
Minutes:
Apologies were received from
Councillor Buckley (Substitute: Councillor McGlone) and Councillor Van Looy (Substitute: Councillor Ayling).
|
810. |
Declarations of Interest
Minutes:
The following declarations were
made at the meeting:
(a)
Councillor Evans – Agenda item 9
(19/00032/FULH – 18 Vardon Drive). Non-pecuniary interest:
Lives close by.
(b)
Councillor D Garston – Agenda item 15
(19/00297/FULH – 11 Leigh Park Road, Leigh-on-Sea).
Non-pecuniary interest: Applicant is known to him.
(c)
Councillor Habermel – Agenda item 13
(1800839/FUL – Land rear of 106 to 112 Highstreet,
Shoeburyness) – Disqualifying non-pecuniary interest: His
Brother’s property backs on to the development.
(d)
Councillor Norman –
Agenda item 8
(19/00019/FULH – 41 Western Road, Leigh-on-Sea).
Non-pecuniary interest: The property overlooks his property on
Vernon Road.
Agenda item 15
(19/00297/FULH – 11 Leigh Park Road). Non-pecuniary interest:
The developer is a family friend.
(e)
Councillor Mulroney –
Agenda item no
4 (18/01820/FULM – Car Wash 120 Broadway,
Leigh-on-Sea),
Agenda item 7
(TPO 3/2018 – Tree Preservation Order, 27 Leigh Park
Road),
Agenda item 15
(19/00297/FULH – 11 Leigh Park Road,
Leigh-on-Sea).
Non-pecuniary
interest: Member of Leigh Society and Leigh Town Council in a
non-planning capacity.
Agenda item 8 (19/00019/FULH – 41 Western Road,
Leigh-on-Sea),
Agenda item 9 (19/00032/FULH – 18 Vardon
Drive),
Agenda item 12 (19/00089/FUL – 1333 London Road,
Leigh-on-Sea),
Agenda item 16 (19/00284/FUL – 135 Marine Parade,
Leigh-on-Sea).
Non-pecuniary interest: Member of Leigh Town Council in a
non-planning capacity.
(f)
Councillor Ward - Agenda item 12 (19/00089/FUL
– 1333 London Road, Leigh-on-Sea). Non-pecuniary interest:
Air BnB mentioned, he owns a guesthouse.
|
811. |
Supplementary Report PDF 126 KB
Minutes:
The Committee received a
supplementary report by the Deputy Chief Executive (Place) that
provided additional information on items referred to elsewhere on
the Agenda.
|
812. |
18/01820/FULM - Car Wash 120 Broadway, Leigh-on-Sea (Leigh Ward) PDF 368 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Proposal: Demolish existing buildings and erect 5 storey
building comprising of 17 self-contained flats with balconies and
amenity space, 272 sq.m of commercial
retail floorspace (Class A1) at ground
floor level, layout landscaping, parking and install vehicular
access onto Victor Drive (Amended Proposal).
Applicant: Plaistow Broadway Filling Stations
Agent: Phase 2 Planning
Resolved:
That PLANNING PERMISSION be
REFUSED for the following reasons:
01 The proposal, by reason its
size, mass, form and detailed design, would result in a bulky and
intrusive addition to the streetscene which harms the character and
appearance of the surroundings including views of the Leigh Cliff
Conservation Area and the setting of the locally listed Grand
Hotel. The development would be over scaled in the
streetscene and cause material, less
than substantial, harm to the character and appearance of the
Conservation Area which is not outweighed by any identified public
benefits including the number of additional residential units
proposed. This is unacceptable and contrary to the National
Planning Policy Framework (2019), policies KP2 and CP4 of the Core
Strategy (2007) and polices DM1, DM3 and DM5 of the Development
Management Document (2015) and advice contained within the Southend
Design and Townscape Guide (2009).
02 The submission does not
include a formal undertaking to secure an appropriate contribution
to affordable housing provision to meet the demand for such housing
in the area or a contribution to secondary education despite it
having been found financially viable for the development proposed
to make such contributions. The proposal also has a lack of
acceptable servicing arrangements which would be prejudicial to
highway safety due to the failure to secure the provision of the
proposed layby. The application is therefore unacceptable and
contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework (2019) and
policies KP3 and CP8 of the Core Strategy (2007) and advice within
Supplementary Planning Document 2 Planning Obligations
(2015).
|
813. |
19/00401/BC3 - Land at Coner of Pitmans Close and Tylers Avenue PDF 201 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Proposal: Change of use
from area formerly used as public conveniences to public car park
including ancillary changes to access and associated
works.
Applicant: Southend-on-Sea Council
Agent: N/A
Resolved:-
That PLANNING PERMISSION be
GRANTED subject to the following conditions:
01
02
03
04
|
The development hereby
permitted shall be begun not later than 3 years beginning with the
date of this permission.
Reason: Required to be imposed
pursuant to Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act
1990.
The development shall be
carried out in accordance with the approved plans: Location Plan,
Proposed layout, Existing layout, Layout
plan received 28/2/19.
Reason: To ensure the
development is carried out in accordance with the development
plan.
Notwithstanding the information
submitted and otherwise hereby approved, the development shall not
be first used unless and until full details of any hard landscaping
and the soft landscaping works to be carried out at the site have
been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning
authority. Any approved hard landscaping works and new boundary
treatments shall be carried out and completed prior to first use of
the development hereby approved and the approved soft landscaping
works within the first planting season following the first use of
the development hereby approved. These details shall include, for
example:-
i)
proposed finished levels and contours
ii)
Any hardsurfacing
materials, markings and means of enclosing the site (including
elevations of all boundary treatments)
iii)
Details of the number, size and location of the
trees, shrubs and plants to be planted together with a planting
specification and details of the management of the landscaping
site.
Reason: To safeguard amenity
and the character and appearance of the site and the surrounding
area in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework
(2019), Policies DM1, DM3 and DM15 of
the Development Management Document (2015) and Policies KP2, CP3
and CP4 of the Core Strategy (2007).
Prior to the first use of the
development hereby approved, full details of the secure cycle
parking shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local
planning authority. The approved cycle parking facilities shall be
provided in full and made available for use by the general public
prior to the first use of the development hereby approved and shall
be retained as such for the lifetime of the development.
Reason: To ensure the provision of adequate cycle
parking and to safeguard the character
and appearance of the site and the surrounding area in accordance
with the National Planning Policy Framework (2019), Policies DM1,
DM3 and DM15 of the Development Management Document (2015) and
Policies KP2 and CP4 of the Core Strategy (2007).
The
Local Planning Authority has acted positively and proactively in
determining this application by assessing the proposal against all
material considerations, including planning policies and any
representations that may have been received and subsequently
determining to grant planning permission in accordance with the
presumption in favour of sustainable development, as set out within
the National Planning Policy Framework.
The detailed analysis ...
view the full minutes text for item 813.
|
|
814. |
19/00237/FUL - Land at 2-4 Brunel Road, Eastwood PDF 210 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Proposal: Demolish
existing industrial buildings. Install two containers, 12 air
conditioning units, generator enclosures, meter cabinets for use as
data centre (class B8) and erect 2.4m high mesh
fence.
Applicant: City Fibre
Agent: WYG
Resolved:-
That PLANNING PERMISSION be
GRANTED subject to the following conditions:
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
|
The development hereby
permitted shall be begun not later than 3 years beginning with the
date of this permission.
Reason: Required to be imposed
pursuant to Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act
1990.
The development shall be
carried out in accordance with the approved plans:
P1808_019-PL-001-A, PL1808_019-002-A, P1808_019-PL-003-B,
P1808_019-PL-007-B, P1808_019-PL-004-A, P1808_019-PL-005-A,
P1808_019-PL-006-B.
Reason: To ensure the
development is carried out in accordance with the development
plan.
Notwithstanding the information
submitted with the application, no development shall be undertaken
unless and until details of the tree protection measures to be used
in relation to the street tree to the west of the site in Progress
Road have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local
planning authority. The agreed tree protection measures shall be in
place before the development is commenced and the development shall
be carried out only in full accordance with the approved tree
protection measures.
Reason: This pre-commencement
condition is needed to safeguard the character and appearance of
the surrounding area in accordance with policies DM1 and DM3 of the
Development Management Document (2015) and Policies KP2 and CP4 of
the Core Strategy (2007).
The data centre electrical
equipment to be installed as part of the approved development shall
be located at a level no lower than 29.30m AOD (above ordnance
datum).
Reason: To ensure the approved
development is safe and does not increase flood risk elsewhere in
accordance with National Planning Policy Framework (2019) and Core
Strategy Policies KP1, KP2 and KP3.
Prior to the first use of the
development hereby approved, details shall be submitted to and
approved in writing by the local planning authority identifying the
provision of covered and secure cycle parking for a minimum of 2
cycles. The approved cycle parking facilities shall be provided in
full and made available for use by the users of the site prior to
the first use of the development hereby approved and shall be
retained as such in perpetuity.
Reason: To ensure the provision of adequate cycle parking
in accordance with Policies DM3, DM8 and DM15 of Development
Management Document.
Hours of construction works
associated with this consent shall be 8am - 6pm Monday to Friday,
8am - 1pm Saturday. No works shall be carried out on Sundays or
Bank Holidays.
Reason: In the interests of the
residential amenity of the adjoining residents and to ensure that
the development complies with the National Planning Policy
Framework (2019), Core Strategy (2007) Policies KP2 and CP4,
Development Management Document (2015) policies DM1 and DM3 and The
Design and Townscape Guide (2009).
Notwithstanding the information
submitted, no development above ground level shall be undertaken
until full details of colour and ...
view the full minutes text for item 814.
|
|
815. |
TPO 3/2018 - Tree Preservation Order, 27 Leigh Park Road PDF 1 MB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Proposal: Tree Preservation Order 01/2017.
Applicant: SJT Developments Ltd
Agent: Marden Homes Limited and
Sharon Hosegood Associates
Resolved:-
That the TREE PRESERVATION
ORDER be CONFIRMED.
|
816. |
19/00019/FULH 41 Western Road, Leigh-on-Sea PDF 192 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Proposal: Erect first floor to convert bungalow into a two
storey dwellinghouse and alter
elevations.
Applicant: Mrs Phillips
Agent:
Mr Andrew Feasey
Resolved:-
That PLANNING PERMISSION be
GRANTED subject to the following conditions:
01
02
03
04
01
02
|
The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in
accordance with the following approved plans – 18_1089-100,
18_1089-101, 18_1089-102-A, 18_1089-103-A, 18_1089-104-A,
18_1089-105, 18_1089-107 and 18_1089-SP
Reason: To ensure that the
development is carried out in accordance with the provisions of the
Development Plan.
The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this
decision.
Reason: Required to be imposed
pursuant to Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act
1990.
All new work to the outside of the building, including
fenestration, must match existing original work in terms of the
choice of materials, method of construction and finished
appearance. This applies unless differences are shown on the
drawings hereby approved or are required by conditions to this
permission.
Reason: To safeguard the visual amenities of the area, in
accordance with National Planning Policy Framework (2019), Core
Strategy (2007) Policy CP4, Policy DM1 of Development Management
Document (2015) and Design and Townscape Guide (2009).
The first floor north facing (rear) windows shall only be glazed
in obscure glass (the glass to be obscure to at least Level 4 on
the Pilkington Levels of Privacy, or such equivalent as may be
agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority) and be
permanently fixed shut, except for any top hung fan light which
shall be a minimum of 1.7 metres above internal finished floor
level of the room. In the case of
multiple or double glazed units at least one layer of glass in the
relevant units shall be glazed in obscure glass to at least Level
4.
Reason: To protect the privacy and environment of people in
neighbouring residential properties, in accordance with the
National Planning Policy Framework (2019), Core Strategy (2007)
Policies KP2 and CP4, Development Management Document (2015)
Policies DM1 and DM3 and Design and Townscape Guide
(2009).
The Local
Planning Authority has acted positively and proactively in
determining this application by assessing the proposal against all
material considerations, including planning policies and any
representations that may have been received and subsequently
determining to grant planning permission in accordance with the
presumption in favour of sustainable development, as set out within
the National Planning Policy Framework.
The detailed analysis is set out in a report on the application
prepared by officers.
Informatives
You are advised that as the proposed extension(s) to your
property equates to less than 100sqm of new floorspace the development benefits from a Minor
Development Exemption under the Community Infrastructure Levy
Regulations 2010 (as amended) and as such no charge is payable. See
www.southend.gov.uk/cil for further details about CIL.
You should be aware that in cases where damage occurs during
construction works to the highway in implementing this permission
that Council may seek to recover the cost of repairing public
highways ...
view the full minutes text for item 816.
|
|
817. |
19/00032/FULH, 18 Vardon Drive PDF 254 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Proposal: Erect single storey rear extension (Amended proposal)
(Retrospective).
Applicant: Ms Emma
Johnson
Agent: CET Architectural Design
Resolved:-
1.
That RETROSPECTIVE PLANNING PERMISSION be REFUSED
for the following reasons:
The
proposed development would, as a result of its height and depth of
its projection on the northern boundary, result in an unacceptable
loss of outlook to a main habitable room of the neighbouring
property and would result in an overly dominant and visually
obtrusive feature within the rear garden scene, forming an
unacceptable sense of enclosure to the detriment of the residential
amenity of the occupiers of No. 20 Vardon Drive. The proposal is
therefore unacceptable and contrary to the National Planning Policy
Framework (2019), Policies KP2 and CP4 of the Core Strategy (2007),
Policies DM1 and DM3 of the Development Management Document (2015)
and the advice contained within the Design and Townscape Guide
(2009).
Informative
You are
advised that as the proposed development equates to less than 100
sqm of additional floorspace so the
development benefits from a Minor Development Exemption under the
Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations 2010 (as amended) and as
such no charge is payable. See www.southend.gov.uk/cil for further
details about CIL.
2. That ENFORCEMENT ACTION be
AUTHORISED to secure the removal of the unauthorised single storey
rear extension.
The
authorised enforcement action to include (if/as necessary) the
authorised enforcement action to include (if/as necessary) the
service of an Enforcement Notice under Section 172 of the Town and
Country Planning Act 1990 and the pursuance of proceedings whether
by prosecution or injunction to secure compliance with the
requirements of said Notice.
When
serving an Enforcement Notice the local planning authority must
ensure a reasonable time for compliance. In this case a compliance period of 4 calendar
months is deemed reasonable.
|
818. |
18/00284/BRCN_B, 35 Beach Avenue, Leigh-on-Sea PDF 1 MB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Breaches of Control: Without planning permission development
built at variance from approved plans.
Case
Officer: Hayley Thompson
Resolved:-
That ENFORCEMENT ACTION be
AUTHORISED to remove the two storey side extension containing
balcony to the front elevation and two doors at first floor level
to the rear elevation.
The authorised enforcement
action to include (if/as necessary) the service of an Enforcement
Notice under Section 172 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
and the pursuance of proceedings whether by prosecution or
injunction to secure compliance with the requirements of said
Notice.
When serving an Enforcement
Notice the local planning authority must ensure a reasonable time
for compliance. In this case a
compliance period of 3 calendar months is deemed
reasonable.
|
819. |
18/00329/UNAU_B - 15-15a Royal Mews, Southend-on-Sea PDF 2 MB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Breaches of Control: Without planning permission, a change of use from
coach house/storage to Class A3/A1, the construction of
a 2.1 metre high post,
installation of two canopies and a uPVC shopfront to the front
elevation.
Case
Officer: Hayley
Thompson
Resolved:-
That ENFORCEMENT ACTION is
AUTHORISED to cease the use of the site as an A1/A3 use, to remove
the uPVC shopfront and door, two canopies and 2 metre high post to
the front elevation.
The authorised enforcement
action to include (if/as necessary) the service of an Enforcement
Notice under Section 172 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
and the pursuance of proceedings whether by prosecution or
injunction to secure compliance with the requirements of said
Notice.
When serving an Enforcement
Notice the local planning authority must ensure a reasonable time
for compliance. In this case a
compliance period of 3 months is deemed reasonable.
In respect of the
advertisements, authority is also sought to bring a prosecution for
an offence under Section 224 of the Town and Country Planning Act
1990 (as amended.)
|
820. |
19/00089/FUL - 1333 London Road, Leigh-on-Sea PDF 220 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Proposal: Convert part of
ground floor storage to rear (Class B8) and erect first floor rear
extension to form one self-contained flat (Class C3) with balconies
to side, alter elevations and layout parking space (Amended
Proposal).
Applicant: Property Point South East Ltd
Agent: SKArchitects
Ms Bailey (a local resident)
spoke as an objector to the application and Mr Saunders
responded.
Resolved:-
That PLANNING PERMISSION be
GRANTED subject to the following conditions:
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
|
The
development hereby permitted shall be begun not later than 3 years
beginning with the date of this permission.
Reason: Required to be imposed pursuant to Section 91 of the
Town and Country Planning Act 1990.
The
development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved
plans: 493-P01 Rev. G and 493-P02 Rev. G
Reason: To ensure the development is carried out in accordance
with the development plan.
No
development above ground level shall take place until samples of
the materials to be used on all the external elevations have been
submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning
authority. The development shall be carried out in accordance with
the approved details before it is occupied.
Reason: To safeguard the character and appearance of the
surrounding area in accordance with policy DM1 of the Development
Management Document (2015) and Policies KP2 and CP4 of the Core
Strategy (2007).
Prior to the first occupation of the dwelling hereby approved, 1
off street car parking space shall be provided at the site as shown
on Drawing No. 493-P02 Rev. G. The approved parking space shall
thereafter be retained in perpetuity only for the parking of
vehicles in connection with the dwelling hereby
approved.
Reason: To ensure the adequate
provision of parking at the site in accordance with policy DM15 of
the Development Management Document (2015).
A scheme detailing how at least 10% of the total
energy needs of the development will be supplied using on site
renewable sources shall be submitted to and agreed in writing by
the Local Planning Authority and implemented in full prior to the
first occupation of the development. This provision shall be made
for the lifetime of the development and in accordance with the
agreed details.
Reason: In the interests of providing sustainable
development in accordance with Policy KP2 of the Core Strategy
(2007), Development Management Document (2015) Policy KP2 and the
Design and Townscape Guide (2009).
Prior to the first occupation of the development hereby approved
water efficient design measures set out in Policy DM2 (iv) of the
Development Management Document to limit internal water consumption
to 105 litres per person
per day
(lpd)
(110 lpd when including
external water consumption), including measures of water
efficient fittings, appliances and water recycling systems such as
grey water and rainwater harvesting shall be installed in the
development hereby approved and be retained in perpetuity
thereafter.
Reason: To minimise the environmental impact of the development
through efficient use of water in accordance with ...
view the full minutes text for item 820.
|
|
821. |
18/00839/FUL - Land Rear of 106 to 112 Highstreet, Shoeburyness PDF 286 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Proposal: Demolish
existing commercial buildings, erect single storey dwelling, layout
parking and amenity area rear of 104-112 High Street (Amended
Proposal).
Applicant: Mr Hundal
Agent: N/A
Mr Iley (a local resident) spoke as an objector to the
application and Mr Hundall (the
applicant) responded.
Resolved:-
The item was DEFFERED to a
future meeting.
|
822. |
18/01122/FUL - Mariner House, 157 High Street PDF 178 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Proposal: Change of use from shop (Class A1) to restaurant
(class A3) and install extraction vent to rear.
Applicant: Pilingstone Ltd
Agent: UPP – Urban Planning Practice
Ms Stone (a local resident)
spoke as an objector to the application, Ms Benedek (the agent) responded.
Resolved:-
That PLANNING PERMISSION be
GRANTED subjected to the following conditions:
01
The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 (three) years from the date of
this decision.
Required to be imposed pursuant to Section 91 of the Town and
Country Planning Act 1990.
02
The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out except in
complete accordance with the details shown on U-PP-LP001,
U-PP-EP001 Rev 4, U-PP- EE001 Rev 4, U-PP-PP001 Rev 4, U-PP-PP002 Rev 7, U-PP-PE001 Rev 7, U-PP-PS001 Rev 5.
Reason: To ensure the development is carried out in accordance
with the development plan.
03
The installation of the plant equipment and noise and odour
mitigation measures associated with the development hereby
approved, shall be carried out before the use commences in full
accordance with the approved plans noted in condition 02 and the
submitted Noise Impact Assessment by Venta Acoustics ref VA2309.180820.NIA dated
7th November 2018 and shall be maintained in perpetuity
thereafter.
Reason: In order to protect the amenities of the
residential occupiers of the development and surrounding
residential occupiers in accordance with policies KP2 and CP4 of
the Core Strategy (207) and Policies DM1 and DM3 of the Development
Management Document 2015.
04
The premises shall not be open for customers outside the following
hours: 09:00 hours to 23:00 hours Monday to Sunday and
at no other times.
Reason: To protect residential amenity and general environmental
quality in accordance with, Core Strategy (2007) Policies KP2 and
CP4, Development Management Document (2015) Policies DM1, DM3 and
Design and Townscape Guide (2009).
05
All deliveries and collections associated with the use hereby
approved shall be between: 07:00-19:00 Monday to Friday; and
08:00-13:00 Saturday; with no deliveries on Sundays or Bank
Holidays.
Reason: To protect the environment of people in neighbouring
properties and general environmental quality in accordance with
Core Strategy (2007) Policies KP2 and CP4, Development Management
Document (2015) Policies DM1 and DM3 and Design and Townscape Guide
(2009).
06
Prior to the first occupation of the building for use class A3
purposes, design details and materials
of the proposed waste storage and an associated waste management
plan shall be submitted to and approved by the local planning
authority. The development shall be
implemented in accordance with the approved details from first
occupation for the proposed use and shall be maintained and managed
as such in perpetuity.
Reason: To ensure that the development is satisfactorily
serviced and that satisfactory waste management is undertaken in
the interests of highway safety and visual amenity and to protect
the character of the surrounding area, in accordance with Policies
KP2, CP3 and CP4 of the Core Strategy (2007) and Policies DM1 and DM15 of the Development
Management Document (2015).
07 Prior to the ...
view the full minutes text for item 822.
|
823. |
19/00297/FULH - 11 Leigh Park Road, Leigh-on-Sea PDF 241 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Proposal: Variation of condition 2 (approved plans) to
application 96/0365 to amend roof pitch to the west and north
elevations, install dormer to the north roof slope, install
rooflight to the south roof slope and
alter elevation detail to balcony (minor material amendments to
planning permission 96/0365 dated 29 November 1996)
(part-retrospective).
Applicant: Mr S.
Ezra
Agent: GLS Architects
Resolved:-
Recommendation
GRANT
PLANNING PERMISSION subject to the following conditions:
01.The development
hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the
following approved plans: 202418 P800, 202418 P300, 202418 P301,
202418 P100, 202418 P101, 90043
P106A.
Reason: To ensure that the development is carried
out in accordance with the provisions of the Development
Plan.
02.The circular
north-east corner ‘turret’ extension shall only be
finished externally in materials and finishes the details of which
shall have been previously submitted to and approved in writing by
the local planning authority.
Reason: In the interests of visual amenity and to
ensure that the appearance of the building does not harm the
character and appearance of the area including the conservation
area. This is as set out in the National Planning Policy Framework,
Policies KP2 and CP4 of the Southend-on-Sea Core Strategy (2007),
Policies DM1, DM3 and DM5 of the Southend-on-Sea Development
Management Document (2015) and the advice contained within the
Southend-on-Sea Design and Townscape Guide (2009).
03.Prior to
installation, full details of window openings to the circular
north-east corner ‘turret’ extension shall have been
submitted to and agreed in writing by the local planning authority.
The window openings shall only be installed in accordance with the
approved details. The details shall include large-scale detailing
and sections to demonstrate the appearance of windows and their
frames in relation to the surrounding structure.
Reason: In the interests of visual amenity and to
ensure that the appearance of the building does not harm the
character and appearance of the area including the conservation
area. This is as set out in the National Planning Policy Framework,
Policies KP2 and CP4 of the Southend-on-Sea Core Strategy (2007),
Policies DM1, DM3 and DM5 of the Southend-on-Sea Development
Management Document (2015) and the advice contained within the
Southend-on-Sea Design and Townscape Guide (2009).
04.Prior to
installation, details of the design of the balcony railings and the
colour finish to the balcony doors shall be submitted to and agreed
in writing by the local planning authority. The doors and railings
shall only be implemented in accordance with the approved
details.
Reason: In the interests of visual amenity and to
ensure that the appearance of the buildings makes a positive
contribution to the character and appearance of the area including
the conservation area. This is as set out in the National Planning
Policy Framework, Policies KP2 and CP4 of the Southend-on-Sea Core
Strategy (2007), Policies DM1, DM3 and DM5 of the Southend-on-Sea
Development Management Document (2015) and the advice contained
within the Southend-on-Sea Design and Townscape Guide
(2009).
05.Prior to
installation, details of the appearance of the ...
view the full minutes text for item 823.
|
|
824. |
19/00284/FUL - 135 Marine Parade, Leigh-on-Sea PDF 233 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Proposal: Extend existing pitched roof with dormers to front and
rear, erect front, side and rear extensions and alter elevations to
existing building to form 7No. self-contained flats with balconies/terraces,
associated parking, amenity space, refuse/cycle store and install
vehicle access onto Thames Drive.
Applicant: Mr Paul
Miller
Agent: BDA
Mr Thomas (a local resident)
spoke as an objector to the application.
Resolved:-
That PLANNING PERMISSION be
REFUSED subject for the following reasons:
|
01
The proposed development, by reason of its excessive scale,
footprint, mass, siting, unresolved design and materials, is
considered to have a detrimental impact on the grain, character and
appearance of the site and the wider area and would be an over
scaled and incongruous addition to the streetscene. The proposal is therefore unacceptable
and contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework (2019),
Policies KP2 and CP4 of the Core Strategy (2007), Policies DM1, DM3
and DM6 of the Development Management Document (2015) and the
Design and Townscape Guide (2009).
02
The proposal fails to meet the requirements of the Nationally
Described Space Standards (2015) in relation to flat F, and the
parking arrangements have resulted in an unacceptable outlook in
relation to the rear bedroom of Flat C and the development as a
whole fails to provide an adequate provision of amenity space for
future occupiers. The proposal overall will therefore result in a
poor standard of accommodation for future occupiers and is
unacceptable and contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework
(2019), Policies KP2 and CP4 of the Core Strategy (2007), Policies
DM1, DM3 and DM8 of the Development Management Document (2015) and
the Design and Townscape Guide (2009).
03The proposed parking arrangements and associated vehicular
movements at the site would result in an increased level of noise
and disturbance which would be to the detriment of the amenities of
104 Thames Drive. The proposal is therefore unacceptable and
contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework (2019), Policies
KP2 and CP4 of the Core Strategy (2007), Policies DM1, DM3 and DM6
of the Development Management Document (2015) and the Design and
Townscape Guide (2009).
04 The
location of the proposed vehicular access, so close to the
convergence of Marine Parade, Thames Drive and Belton Way, is such
that it cannot safely accommodate the increase in vehicular
movements arising from a development of the nature proposed, to the
detriment of highway safety and the free flow of traffic. This
impact will be exacerbated in peak holiday periods when traffic on
these roads becomes saturated by visitor, resident and business
journeys. The proposal is therefore unacceptable and contrary to
the National Planning Policy Framework (2019), Core Strategy (2007)
policies KP2, CP3 and CP4 and policy DM15 of the Development
Management Document (2015).
The
Local Planning Authority has acted positively and proactively in
determining this application by identifying matters of concern with
the proposal and determining the application within a timely
manner, clearly setting out the reason(s) for refusal, allowing the
Applicant the opportunity to consider the harm ...
view the full minutes text for item 824.
|
|
825. |
19/00075/FUL - 22-24 St Benet's Road PDF 265 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Proposal: Raise ridge height, erect part one, part two and part
three storey rear extension with dormers to rear and roof lights to
front, convert dwellinghouses into 6
self-contained flats, install layout parking, cycle storage, bin
stores and amenity space (Amended Proposal).
Applicant: Mr Paul
Miller
Agent: BDA Architecture
Resolved:-
That PLANNING PERMISSION be
REFUSED for the following reasons:
|
|
01
|
The
proposed extensions would by reason of their size, siting and
design be incongruous, poorly integrated, unsympathetic and overly
dominant additions to the detriment of the character and appearance
of the host property and the surrounding area including the rear
garden scene. This would be unacceptable and contrary to the
National Planning Policy Framework, Policies KP2 and CP4 of the
Southend-on-Sea Core Strategy (2007), Policies DM1 and DM3 of the
Southend-on-Sea Development Management Document (2015) and the
advice contained within the Southend-on-Sea Design and Townscape
Guide (2009).
|
02
|
The
proposed rear extensions, as a result of their height, design,
size, rear extent and proximity to site boundaries,
would appear as excessively dominant and visually
overbearing features resulting in an unacceptable sense of
enclosure to the neighbouring properties to the south of the site
at 16 St Benet’s Road to the detriment of their amenity. This
would be unacceptable and contrary to the
National Planning Policy Framework, Policies KP2 and CP4 of the
Southend-on-Sea Core Strategy (2007), Policies DM1 and DM3 of the
Southend-on-Sea Development Management Document (2015) and the
advice contained within the Southend-on-Sea Design and Townscape
Guide (2009).
|
|
The
Local Planning Authority has acted positively and proactively in
determining this application by identifying matters of concern with
the proposal and determining the application within a timely
manner, clearly setting out the reason(s) for refusal, allowing the
Applicant the opportunity to consider the harm caused and whether
or not it can be remedied by a revision to the
proposal. The detailed analysis is set
out in a report prepared by officers. In the circumstances the
proposal is not considered to be sustainable development. The Local
Planning Authority is willing to discuss the best course of
action.
|
|
Informative
|
|
Please note that this application would be liable for a payment
under the Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations 2010 (as
amended) if planning permission had been granted. Therefore if an
appeal is lodged and subsequently allowed, the CIL liability will
be applied. Any revised application would also be CIL
liable.
|
|
826. |
Councillor D Norman MBE
Minutes:
The Committee paid tribute to long serving
Development Control Committee Member, Councillor D Norman MBE, who
is standing down as a Councillor.
Committee Members thanked him for his service
and wished him every best wishes for the future.
|
827. |
Vote of Thanks
Minutes:
The Committee thanked the Chairman for the
able way in which he had conducted the business of the meetings
over the past Municipal Year.
|