Issue - meetings

Seaway Car Park

Meeting: 09/07/2020 - Policy and Resources Scrutiny Committee (Item 139)

139 Seaway Car Park pdf icon PDF 493 KB

Minute 866 (Cabinet Report circulated separately)

Called in by Councillors Cox and Davidson

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Committee considered Minute 866 of the meeting of the Cabinet held on 25 February 2020, which had been called in to the Policy and Resources Scrutiny Committee, together with a report of the Executive Director (Finance and Resources), that provided an update on the current situation in relation to the Seaway Car Park and presented options to enable Cabinet to decide how it wished to proceed in relation to the proposed development of the car park and associated land.

 

With the agreement of the Committee, the Chair indicated that he intended to take this item together with the following agenda item (Item 7 - Notice of Motion - Seaway Car Park Development), as the two matters were related to similar issues.

 

Resolved:

 

1.          That the following decision of the Cabinet be noted:

 

“1. That option 2 set out in the submitted report be approved, namely the Council maintains its support for the Development and does not serve notice to terminate the Agreement at least until such time as the final decision has been made on the planning application 18/02302/BC4M.

 

Such support would be maintained on the basis of:

 

-        The economic case including the significant job opportunities that the development will bring;

-        The contribution to the Council’s published Ambition and Outcomes;

-        The level of commitment made by the Council and Turnstone;

-        The desire to maintain the currently committed tenants;

-        The progress which has been made to date;

-        The reduced risk of the Homes England funding claw back.

 

2. That while the planning appeal is running, negotiations be progressed with Turnstone about the possibility of a lease-wrapper/income strip lease model to accelerate delivery and provide additional rent for the Council through a different model and any other matters which would accelerate delivery.”

 

2.          That the decision of the Cabinet and the Notice of Motion be referred to full Council for consideration in accordance with Council Procedure Rule 39.

 

Note: This is an Executive Function

Cabinet Member: Cllr R Woodley

 

 


Meeting: 18/03/2020 - Policy and Resources Scrutiny Committee (Item 6.)

6. Seaway Car Park pdf icon PDF 493 KB

Minute 866 (Cabinet Report circulated separately)

Called in by Councillors Cox and Davidson


Meeting: 25/02/2020 - Cabinet (Item 866)

866 Seaway Car Park pdf icon PDF 493 KB

Report of Executive Director (Finance and Resourcees) – to follow

Decision:

The Cabinet considered a report of Executive Director (Finance and Resources) presenting options for Cabinet to decide how it wishes to proceed in relation to the proposed development of the Seaway Car Park and associated land (“the development”) and the agreement for Lease and Sale dated 10th December 2014 made between the Council and Turnstone Southend Ltd (“Turnstone”) (and subsequently varied on 2nd May 2019 pursuant to Minute 605 of Cabinet held 17th January 2019, Minute 668 of Policy and Resources Scrutiny Committee held 30th January 2019 and Minute 734 of Full Council 21st February held 21st February 2019).

 

On consideration of the report, the Leader drew attention to an email he had received from Murray Foster, on behalf of Southend Business Partnership (and the businesses who are members), in support of the Seaway Development.

 

 

Resolved:

 

1. That option 2 set out in the submitted report be approved, namely the Council maintains its support for the Development and does not serve notice to terminate the Agreement at least until such time as the final decision has been made on the planning application 18/02302/BC4M.

 

Such support would be maintained on the basis of:

 

-       The economic case including the significant job opportunities that the development will bring;

-       The contribution to the Council’s published Ambition and Outcomes;

-       The level of commitment made by the Council and Turnstone;

-       The desire to maintain the currently committed tenants;

-       The progress which has been made to date;

-       The reduced risk of the Homes England funding claw back.

 

2. That while the planning appeal is running, negotiations be progressed with Turnstone about the possibility of a lease-wrapper/income strip lease model to accelerate delivery and provide additional rent for the Council through a different model and any other matters which would accelerate delivery.

 

Reasons for decisions:

 

To determine a way forward in relation to the proposed development of seaways car park and associated land.

 

Other options:

 

1. The Council does not serve notice to terminate and maintains its support for the Development but does not seek to secure any benefits by renegotiation.  This option is not dealt with in detail because it does not do anything to help or accelerate delivery.

 

2. The Council serves notice to terminate (recommendation 2.2(a) of the report) and then separately enters into negotiations with Turnstone for alternative arrangements.  This option is not dealt with in detail in the report because terminating the Agreement will put current sub-tenant commitments at risk and would only cause complications.

 

Note: This is an Executive Function

Eligible for call-in to: Policy & Resources Scrutiny Committee

Cabinet Member: Cllr Woodley

Minutes:

The Cabinet considered a report of Executive Director (Finance and Resources) presenting options for Cabinet to decide how it wishes to proceed in relation to the proposed development of the Seaway Car Park and associated land (“the development”) and the agreement for Lease and Sale dated 10th December 2014 made between the Council and Turnstone Southend Ltd (“Turnstone”) (and subsequently varied on 2nd May 2019 pursuant to Minute 605 of Cabinet held 17th January 2019, Minute 668 of Policy and Resources Scrutiny Committee held 30th January 2019 and Minute 734 of Full Council 21st February held 21st February 2019).

 

On consideration of the report, the Leader drew attention to an email he had received from Murray Foster, on behalf of Southend Business Partnership (and the businesses who are members), in support of the Seaway Development.

 

 

Resolved:

 

1. That option 2 set out in the submitted report be approved, namely the Council maintains its support for the Development and does not serve notice to terminate the Agreement at least until such time as the final decision has been made on the planning application 18/02302/BC4M.

 

Such support would be maintained on the basis of:

 

-       The economic case including the significant job opportunities that the development will bring;

-       The contribution to the Council’s published Ambition and Outcomes;

-       The level of commitment made by the Council and Turnstone;

-       The desire to maintain the currently committed tenants;

-       The progress which has been made to date;

-       The reduced risk of the Homes England funding claw back.

 

2. That while the planning appeal is running, negotiations be progressed with Turnstone about the possibility of a lease-wrapper/income strip lease model to accelerate delivery and provide additional rent for the Council through a different model and any other matters which would accelerate delivery.

 

Reasons for decisions:

 

To determine a way forward in relation to the proposed development of seaways car park and associated land.

 

Other options:

 

1. The Council does not serve notice to terminate and maintains its support for the Development but does not seek to secure any benefits by renegotiation.  This option is not dealt with in detail because it does not do anything to help or accelerate delivery.

 

2. The Council serves notice to terminate (recommendation 2.2(a) of the report) and then separately enters into negotiations with Turnstone for alternative arrangements.  This option is not dealt with in detail in the report because terminating the Agreement will put current sub-tenant commitments at risk and would only cause complications.

 

Note: This is an Executive Function

*called-in to: Policy & Resources Scrutiny Committee

Cabinet Member: Cllr Woodley


 

Get the best from this site

We use simple text files called 'cookies'. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used. For more information, including how to turn cookies off, see more about cookies - or simply click the Continue button to use this site as normal.