Issue - meetings

Corporate Performance Management 2016/17

Meeting: 25/01/2016 - Place Scrutiny Committee (Item 579)

579 Corporate Performance Management 2016/17 pdf icon PDF 20 KB

The report has been circulated with the Cabinet Agenda for its meeting on 19th January 2016. The relevant Minute and report will be referred direct to all Scrutiny Committees for consideration

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Committee considered Minute 557 of Cabinet held on 19th January 2016, which had been referred direct by Cabinet, together with a report of the Chief Executive on the Council’s corporate approach to performance management for 2016/17.

 

Resolved:-

 

That the following decisions of Cabinet be noted:

 

“(i) That the corporate performance measures to be monitored via the Monthly Performance Report (MPR) for 2016/17, as set out at Appendix 1 to the submitted report, be approved.

 

(ii) That the corporate priority actions, to support implementation of the Council’s 2016/17 Corporate Priorities, as set out at Appendix 2 to the report, be approved.”

 

Note:- This is an Executive Function.

Executive Councillor:- Woodley


Meeting: 19/01/2016 - Cabinet (Item 557)

557 Corporate Performance Management 2016/17 pdf icon PDF 20 KB

Report of Chief Executive

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Cabinet considered a report of the Chief Executive on the Council’s corporate approach to performance management for 2016/17.

 

Resolved:-

 

(i)            That the corporate performance measures to be monitored via the Monthly Performance Report (MPR) for 2016/17, as set out at Appendix 1 to the submitted report, be approved.

(ii)          That the corporate priority actions, to support implementation of the Council’s 2016/17 Corporate Priorities, as set out at Appendix 2 to the report, be approved. 

Reason for Decision

 

To ensure that measures and targets are in place by which the Council can assess its performance against its agreed corporate priorities.  

 

Other Options

 

1. Significantly increasing the numbers of performance measures and indicators. This would place significant pressure on available resources to undertake the necessary monitoring, and would result in diverting resources from other priority areas.

 

2. Not identifying any Corporate Priority actions or indicators. This would leave the Council unable to monitor its performance against its key priorities or to assess whether resources are appropriately allocated.

 

Note:- This is an Executive Function.
Referred direct to all three Scrutiny Committees.
Executive Councillor:- Woodley

 


 

Get the best from this site

We use simple text files called 'cookies'. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used. For more information, including how to turn cookies off, see more about cookies - or simply click the Continue button to use this site as normal.