Agenda item

18/00820/FUL - 37-38 Shoebury Avenue, Southend-on-Sea (Shoeburyness Ward)

Minutes:

Proposal:  Change of use from storage and distribution (Class B8) to a gymnasium (Class D2) and Cheerleading and Gymnastics Training Centre (Class D2)

Applicant:  Miss R Blatch

Agent:  Mr N Kenney

 

Resolved:  (a)  That planning permission be REFUSED for the following reason:

 

01  The applicant has failed to demonstrate that there is no long term or reasonable prospect of the site being used for B class uses, and that the proposed use cannot reasonably be located elsewhere within the area that it serves.  On this basis it is concluded that the continued use of the premises as proposed would undermine the employment growth area and the long term availability of employment-generating development in the Borough. There are found to be no material planning considerations of sufficient weight to outweigh the harm caused by this conflict with development plan policy. This is unacceptable and contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework (2018), Policies KP1, KP2 and CP1 of the Core Strategy (2007) and Policies DM3 and DM11 of the Development Management Document (2015).

 

The Local Planning Authority has acted positively and proactively in determining this application by identifying matters of concern with the proposal and discussing those with the Applicant.  Unfortunately, it has not been possible to resolve those matters within the timescale allocated for the determination of this planning application and therefore, the proposal is not considered to be sustainable development. However, the Local Planning Authority has clearly set out, within its report, the steps necessary to remedy the harm identified within the reasons for refusal - which may lead to the submission of a more acceptable proposal in the future.

 

Informatives

 

1  You are advised that as the proposed development at your property benefits from a Minor Development Exemption under the Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations 2010 (as amended) and as such no charge is payable. See www.southend.gov.uk/cil for further details about CIL.

 

(b)  That That ENFORCEMENT ACTION be AUTHORISED to secure the cessation of the use of the unauthorised of both premises.

 

The authorised enforcement action to include (if/as necessary) the service of an Enforcement Notice under Section 172 of the Act or a Breach of Condition Notice and the pursuance of proceedings whether by prosecution or injunction to secure compliance with the requirements of the Enforcement Notice or Breach of Condition Notice.

 

When serving an Enforcement or Breach of Condition Notice the local planning authority must ensure a reasonable time for compliance. In this case a compliance period of 9 months is considered reasonable for the relocation of the business.

 

Taking enforcement action in this case may amount to an interference with the owners’ and/or occupiers’ Human Rights. However, it is necessary for the local planning authority to balance the rights of the owners and/or occupiers against its legitimate aims to regulate and control land within its area. In this particular case it is considered reasonable, expedient, and proportionate and in the public interest to pursue enforcement action on the grounds set out in the formal recommendation.

Supporting documents:

 

Get the best from this site

We use simple text files called 'cookies'. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used. For more information, including how to turn cookies off, see more about cookies - or simply click the Continue button to use this site as normal.